|
Guardian Services, Inc. |
National Fire Protection Association ActivitiesNFPA 12 and NFPA 2001 2008 Editions Released by Standards CouncilNFPA 12 and NFPA 2001, 2008 editions, were issued by the NFPA Standards Council with an effective date of August 15, 2007. NFPA 2001 retains the currently mandated minimum design concentration for Class C hazards equal to at least that for Class A surface fires (see below for background). The appeal by Mr. Tom Wysocki of Guardian Services, Inc. alleging inaccuracies in the new requirements which are to be met if new carbon dioxide total flood systems are to be installed in "normally occupied" spaces was considered and rejected by the NFPA Standards Council. NFPA 12 was issued as recommended by the majority of the NFPA technical committee. Results of Public Debate on NFPA 12 and NFPA 2001 Issues, June 6 BostonNFPA 2001The current NFPA 2001 specifies in 5.4.2.5
Minimum
design concentration for Class C hazards shall be at least that for Class A
surface fire. At the time of the last NFPA 2001 technical committee meeting, the committee had laboratory test data that indicated required concentrations of clean agent to extinguish fire increased as external energy was added to the fire - such as energy from ohmic heating caused by flow of electricity through a conductor. Based solely on this information, the committee recommended the 33% increase for Class C fire hazards. Since that meeting, Fike and DuPont have studied the issue and recognized a very significant shortcoming in the tests used by the committee in an attempt to justify the increase. The tests involving electricity all used nichrome resistance wire as the conductor. Nichrome wire is typically used in toasters and other electric heating appliances. It is NOT used as a conductor in computers and telecommunications equipment, equipment commonly protected with clean agent systems. Copper conductors are typically used in such equipment. Fike and DuPont attempted to model the laboratory tests considered by the technical committee using copper wire as the conductor. Using copper wire, ignition of the plastic test fuels did not occur. The copper wire failed (broke) before ignition occurred. It was found that copper conductor failed at temperatures below 1000 deg F. Further it was found that in the tests considered by the technical committee the temperature of the nichrome wire was 1800 F or more. DuPont and Fike devised a test protocol that more closely models real world conditions in Class C hazards such as computer or telecommunications equipment with the electric power remaining constantly on during and after a fire event. Tests run with the new protocol indicate that the currently required Class C concentrations reliably extinguish fires in the tests. Thus, based on these tests, no increase in the minimum Class C concentrations is shown to be necessary. A motion was made at the Technical Committee Report session on June 6, 2007 in Boston to rescind the proposed increase in minimum Class C design concentration. The NFPA members voting at the Technical Committee Report Session upheld the motion on the floor recommending that the current minimum design concentration for Class C fires be retained. For more information on the DuPont/Fike tests, click here. To go to the Fire Suppression Systems Association website and download a video clip of an actual Class C fire test performed at the Fike research facility, please click here. NFPA 12On June 6 at the NFPA Technical Committee Report session, GSI's Tom Wysocki made a motion to reject a portion of the Technical Committee report on the Standard for CO2 systems and retain existing language which prohibits the use of total flood carbon dioxide systems in normally occupied spaces with certain very specific exceptions permitted. The current NFPA paragraph 4.1 states "4.1.1* Carbon dioxide total flooding fire-extinguishing systems shall not be installed in normally occupied enclosures except as permitted in 4.1.2 through 4.1.4." The permitted exceptions are for normally occupied hazards where there are no suitable fire extinguishing agents that can provide an equivalent level of fire protection to carbon dioxide, for marine systems installed with required personnel safety features (carbon dioxide is internationally recognized as a standard protection for shipboard machinery spaces), and for existing systems which are equipped with all required personnel safety features. Mr. Wysocki stated that the current language in NFPA 12 Edition 2005 is clear, direct and places the responsibility for determining if a total flood CO2 system is required for normally occupied enclosures clearly on the fire protection professional. It requires the fire protection professional responsible for the system design to "document" the need for total flood CO2 to satisfaction of the authority having jurisdiction. The current language in NFPA 12 Edition 2005 provides an exception for Marine CO2 systems which is in accordance with United States Coast Guard regulations and with international Marine standards. Mr. Wysocki pointed out a number of errors and inaccuracies in the proposed wording. Several Technical Committee members spoke in favor of the proposed wording. Mr. Norbert Makowka, Technical Director of the National Association of Fire Equipment Distributors, spoke in favor of Mr. Wysocki's motion. The vote of the members present at the Technical Committee Report session voted to recommend the proposed wording developed by the technical committee in spite of the various inaccuracies. Mr. Wysocki will make an appeal to the NFPA Standards Council asking that they process the standard as recommended by the Technical Committee with the exception of the proposed change to 4.1. Computer and Telecommunications Technical Committees MeetDuring April, NFPA technical committees on protection of computer facilities and protection of telecommunications facilities met in Boulder Colorado. In addition to the separate meetings of the two technical committees to consider their respective standards, a joint meeting of both NFPA 75 and NFPA 76 technical committees was held. NFPA 75 chair Tom Wysocki and NFPA 76 chair Ralph Transue felt that a joint meeting would be beneficial in helping committee members recognize the similarities and differences in the respective occupancies covered by the standards, and develop guidance in each standard as to where and when the respective documents should be applied. The joint meeting was a great success - a joint task group was established to consider issues of common interest. Many of the participants were then able to tour the National Center for Atmospheric Research to view cutting edge scientific computers and the facilities which support them. The ROP for NFPA 75 has passed technical committee ballot and is published on the NFPA website. Deadline for Public Comment is March 2, 2007. Standards Council rejects appeal - Releases NFPA 12 2005 editionThe Standards Council has rejected an EPA appeal on the proposed NFPA 12 2005 edition. In doing so, the Council released NFPA 12 2005 edition as recommended by the Technical Committee and accepted by the NFPA membership. NFPA 12 2005 is now the current edition of the Standard on Carbon Dioxide Extinguishing Systems.The 2005 edition contains a number of new requirements intended to enhance the already good safety record of carbon dioxide fire extinguishing systems. Several retroactive requirements have been added to the standard. Therefore it is essential that all those associated with carbon dioxide fire extinguishing systems become familiar with the new standard and take necessary actions to comply with its requirements. Click here to transfer to the NFPA website.NFPA Special Achievement Award to Sam McTier and Tom Wysocki
|
|
Last revised 12/20/07
|